ZADOVOLJSTVO ZBOG ARHITEKTURE ILI ARHITEKTURA ZADOVOLJSTVA
Slike: Bojan Petričević
Opšta je slika da je moderno vreme donelo najviše elemenata koji doprinose kvalitetu doživljavanja stvari koje nas okružuju. Arhitektura je primer na kojem je to najčešće i realizovano. Ona kao vrsta umetnosti koja se koristi za osnovne životne potrebe može imati dvojaku ulogu u procesu doživljaja, i nije pošteno presuđivati koja od njih je značajnija za korisnika ili uživaoca.
Dvojnost arhitekture je postala najprimetnija pojavom Moderne u pokušaju da se prihvati političko-ideološko ali i likovno stanovište koje ukazuje na eliminisanje svih nepotrebnih dekoracija i hedonističkih elemenata arhitekture i podražavala je funkciju i formu koja je nastala kao posledica upotrebljivosti.
DA LI ARHITEKTURA SME DA IMA ODVOJENU NAMENU OD FUNKCIJE JE OVDE NAJVAŽNIJE PITANJE.
Najzastupljeniji vid arhitekture su objekti u kojima ljudi žive i kao takva ta arhitektura biva sagledavana svakodnevno, i to iznutra i spolja. Međutim sa spoljašnje strane je mogu sagledavati svi i tu je pozicija arhitekte ponovo složena. Da li formirati vizuelni prikaz za korisnike ili za gledaoce na koje objekat treba da ostavi utisak? Arhitektura koja nastaje da bi korisnik koristio sadržaje unutar ili izvan objekta i koja je podređena udovoljavanju individualnih osobina i navika, kao što su to restorani, hoteli ili slično takođe mora imati sličan unutrašnji konflikt.
Arhitektura kao stvar ideje, je dematerijalizovana konceptualna disciplina sa tipološkim ili morfološkim osobinama ili sa druge strane empirijski događaj koji se oslanja na čula. Arhitektura definitivno danas leži u ove obe definicije. Precenjeni čulni doživljaj pri prvom kontaktu sa arhitekturom je nešto što je široko rasprostranjena pojava. Taj doživljaj ne bi smeo da bude faktor ocenjivanja. On gradi povratnu spregu i daje značaj toj scenskoj ulozi arhitekture. Konflikt ovakve ideologije i utilitarnog stava prema arhitekturi, o kome se diskutovalo stotinama godina, jeste, u stvari, paralela svim prirodnim dualitetima koji se u isto vreme isključuju i nadopunjuju, slično odnosu našin unutrašnjih ličnosti „korisnika“ i „posmatrača“. U tome se nalazi jedinstvo, razumevanje arhitekture, proces arhitekture.
PLEASURE IN ARCHITECTURE OR ARCHITECTURE OF PLEASURE
Images: Bojan Petričević
The overall picture shows that the modern age has brought most of the elements that contribute to the quality of experiencing things that surround us. The architecture is an example where it is commonly realized. Being a kind of art that is used for the basic necessities of life it can have a dual role in the process of experiencing, thus it is not fair to arbiter which of them is more important to those who use it or those who take pleasure in it.
The duality of architecture has become noticeable with the appearance of Modernism in the attempt to accept the political-ideological and also the artistic standpoint, eliminating unnecessary decorations and hedonistic architectural elements and supporting the function and form that were created as a result of usability.
THE MAIN QUESTION THAT ARISES IS WHETHER ARCHITECTURE CAN HAVE ITS PURPOSE SEPARATED FROM ITS FUNCTION.
The most common type of architecture are the buildings where people live, and, as such, this architecture is being seen and evaluated every day, inside and out. The fact that those buildings can be seen from outside by all, users and observers, makes this architecture and architect’s position complex. Should this architecture be created as a visual presentation for users or for observers who the building should impress? Similar inner conflict is apparent in the architecture created for the users to use content within or outside the facility, architecture which is subject to the fulfillment of individual characteristics, needs and habits, such as are the restaurants and hotels.
On one hand architecture, as an idea, is a dematerialized conceptual discipline with its typological and morphological properties and, on the other hand, an empirical event that relies on the senses. Architecture today is definitely both. Sensory experience of architecture, the first contact with architecture, is widely spread and overestimated. That experience should not be the first and the only factor of evaluation. It in return gives greater importance to the scenic role of architecture. Conflict between this ideology and the utilitarian attitude towards architecture, which has been the subject of discussions for many hundreds of years, is ,in fact, a parallel to all natural dualities that, at the same time exclude and supplement each other, similarly to the constant flow and interrelation between our inner personalities of a „user“ and an „observer“. Within lies the unity, understanding of architecture and the process of architecture itself.
